December
6th is a black day for the Indian Democracy. Whatever be the motive for the
demolition, I do not know whether this act can be justified. Those who
initiated this brutal act may have their reasons and the other party may still
have resentment to counter attack. What happens often is that any event, sometimes even a political blunder or some vested interests of the politicians are often identified with religion and therefore they are seen to be religious conflicts rather than the blunder of some politicians or fundamentalism.
All of us do know
that religions, irrespective of their place of origin, keep Love as their
central teaching.
Everyone thinks
that his religion is the greatest. His religion is the truest and the purest. I
do not think that this is wrong. When one believes he accepts a particular
creed because it is meaningful to his life. But communicating one’s religious
truth often ends up in violent conflicts. One wants to prove his religion’s
love and non-violence by violence. Proving one’s love through violence can
never be possible.
Comparative
studies have shown that non-violence is the foundational teaching of all
religions. Mere writings about the message of love or non-violence cannot
reduce the religious conflicts. It can be done only with the believers’ act of
trust and love. One has to trust the other and more love the other forgiving
the mischievous deeds of the other. Only when we find someone transcending the
act of rebellion and revenge, trust can be built.
Unless this
love is taken to heart
and we trust and respect and love one another,
we will
not be able to live as true believers.